The institutionalisation of mining company sustainability disclosures

Item

Title
The institutionalisation of mining company sustainability disclosures
Description
This paper reports the analyses of the social and environmental disclosures of listed South African mining
companies and compares the disclosures of larger companies with those of smaller companies using
several different categories of comparison. The prior literature suggests that larger companies almost
invariably disclose more social and environmental information due to their greater visibility. The expected
differences are found in social disclosures, but not in environmental disclosures. An institutional
theory framework explains these unexpected environmental disclosure findings. Specifically, normative
isomorphism, usually driven by professionalization, becomes more prominent when a field reaches
maturity and the field of corporate environmental disclosures among mining companies has reached a
level of maturity and professionalization causing disclosures to be similar. These similarities have now
reached the stage where small companies disclose the same amount of environmental information, in
the same general format, as large companies.
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro
hb2015
Creator
De Villiers, Charl Johannes
Low, Mary
Samkin, Grant
Publisher
Date
2015-01-27T05:26:21Z
2015-01-27T05:26:21Z
2014-12
Type
Postprint Article
Format
application/pdf
Identifier
De Villiers, CJ, Low, M & Samkin, G 2014, 'The institutionalisation of mining company sustainability disclosures', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 84, pp. 51-58.
0959-6526 (print)
1879-1786 (online)
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.089
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43429
Language
en
Rights
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cleaner Production. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 84, pp. 51-58, 2014. doi : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.089.
Item sets
Accounting